Caring For The Body And Mind In Long-Term Care.

A podiatrist in a skilled nursing facility witnesses the harms of siloed care and the lack of behavioral health care for residents.

[Emergency intervention of hospitalisation at home in nursing home during the pandemic period of Covid-19]. / Intervention en urgence de l'hospitalisation à domicile en établissement d'hébergement pour personnes âgées dépendantes pendant la période pandémique de la Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the pandemic Covid-19, the Hospitalization A Home (HAH) of the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) has implemented a new organisation with emergency interventions to meet the needs of residents in palliative care in nursing home. The objective of the study was to describe their clinical characteristics, the modalities of the intervention and their care pathways during the HAH intervention. METHODS: This is a descriptive study on the emergency intervention of the HAH in 74 nursing home in the area of Ile-de-France during one month (April 2020) with a sample of 132 residents. The data collection included the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of residents and on data about nursing home included. RESULTS: Emergency intervention of the HAH in nursing home involved very elderly residents with severe functional disabilities and with signs of respiratory failure linked to the Covid 19. The intervention took place mainly during the day and the week with a territorial heterogeneity and with a double medical validation between the prescribers and the HAH physician. Seventy per cent of the residents died at their living place. Among nursing home included, they were of medium size, mainly with private status and a large majority had already collaborated with the APHP's HAH. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Emergency intervention of the HAH in nursing home was feasible and responded to an unmeet need for palliative care residents. These results should allow the ongoing development of this new organization for elderly population living in private homes.

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Use and Spending Before and After Introduction of the Public Health Emergency Waiver During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicare introduced a public health emergency (PHE) waiver in March 2020, removing a 3-day hospitalization requirement before fee-for-service beneficiaries could receive skilled nursing facility (SNF) care benefits. Objective: To assess whether there were changes in SNF episode volume and Medicare spending on SNF care before and during the PHE among long-term care (LTC) residents and other Medicare beneficiaries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used Medicare fee-for-service claims and the Minimum Data Set for Medicare beneficiaries who were reimbursed for SNF care episodes from January 2018 to September 2021 in US SNFs. Exposures: The prepandemic period (January 2018-February 2020) vs the PHE period (March 2020-September 2021). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were SNF episode volume, characteristics, and costs. Episodes were defined as standard (with a preceding 3-day hospitalization) or waiver (with other or no acute care use). Results: Skilled nursing facility care was provided to 4 299 863 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries had on average 130 400 monthly SNF episodes in the prepandemic period (mean [SD] age of beneficiaries, 78.9 [11.0] years; 59% female) and 108 575 monthly episodes in the PHE period (mean [SD] age of beneficiaries, 79.0 [11.1] years; 59% female). All waiver episodes increased from 6% to 32%, and waiver episodes without preceding acute care increased from 3% to 18% (from 4% to 49% among LTC residents). Skilled nursing facility episodes provided for LTC residents increased by 77% (from 15 538 to 27 537 monthly episodes), primarily due to waiver episodes provided for residents with COVID-19 in 2020 and early 2021 (62% of waiver episodes without preceding acute care). Skilled nursing facilities in the top quartile of waiver episodes were more often for-profit (80% vs 68%) and had lower quality ratings (mean [SD] overall star rating, 2.7 [1.4] vs 3.2 [1.4]; mean [SD] staffing star rating, 2.5 [1.1] vs 3.0 [1.2]) compared with SNFs in the other quartiles. Monthly Medicare spending on SNF care was $2.1 billion before the pandemic and $2.0 billion during the PHE. For LTC residents, monthly SNF spending increased from $301 million to $585 million while spending on hospitalizations remained relatively stable. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that the PHE waiver for SNF care was associated with a marked increase in the prevalence of SNF episodes without a preceding hospitalization, especially in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The waiver was used primarily among certain types of facilities and for LTC residents with COVID-19. Although the effect of the waiver cannot be differentiated from that of the pandemic, overall SNF care costs did not increase substantially; for LTC residents, the waiver was applied primarily for COVID-19 care, suggesting the waiver's successful implementation.

"We Did More Damage": How COVID-19 Collapsed the Care Convoys of Residents Living With Dementia.

COVID-19 regulations have posed challenges for long-term care (LTC). However, few studies have examined how such regulations influenced the care of residents living with dementia. Our objective was to gain an understanding of LTC administrative leaders' perceptions regarding the impact of the COVID-19 response on this population. Using the convoys of care framework, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Forty-three participants, representing 60 LTC facilities, completed one interview where they described how COVID-19 policies shaped care for residents living with dementia. Results from deductive thematic analysis revealed that participants believed the care convoys of residents living with dementia were strained. Participants emphasized how diminished family involvement, increased staff responsibilities, and the industry's heightened regulatory climate contributed to disrupted care. Further, they highlighted how pandemic-focused safety guidelines did not always consider the unique needs of those living with dementia. Consequently, this study may inform policy by outlining considerations for future emergencies.

Dual impacts of Medicare payment reform and the COVID-19 pandemic on therapy staffing in skilled nursing facilities.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of new skilled nursing facility (SNF) Medicare payment policy, the Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM), resulted in immediate declines in physical and occupational therapy staffing. This study characterizes continuing impacts of PDPM in conjunction with COVID-19 on SNF therapy staffing and examines variability in staffing changes based on SNF organizational characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare administrative data from a national cohort of SNFs between January 2019 and March 2022. Interrupted time series mixed effects regression examined changes in level and trend of total therapy staffing minutes/patient-day during PDPM and COVID-19 and by type of staff (therapists, assistants, contractors, and in-house staff). Secondary analyses examined the variability in staffing by organizational characteristics. RESULTS: PDPM resulted in a -6.54% level change in total therapy staffing, with larger declines for assistants and contractors. Per-patient staffing fluctuated during COVID-19 as the census changed. PDPM-related staffing declines were larger in SNFs that were: Rural, for-profit, chain-affiliated, provided more intensive therapy, employed more therapy assistants, and admitted more Medicare patients before PDPM. COVID-19 resulted in larger staffing declines in rural SNFs but smaller early declines in SNFs that were hospital-based, for-profit, or received more relief funding. CONCLUSIONS: SNFs that historically engaged in profit-maximizing behaviors (e.g., providing more therapy via lower-paid assistants) had larger staffing declines during PDPM compared to other SNFs. Therapy staffing fluctuated during COVID-19, but PDPM-related reductions persisted 2 years into the pandemic, especially in rural SNFs. Results suggest specific organizational characteristics that should be targeted for staffing and quality improvement initiatives.

Experiences of a Nursing Team Working in a Residential Care Facility for Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Experiences of staff working in residential long-term care facilities (LTCFs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are likely to differ from that of staff working in acute hospitals. The aim of the current study was to describe the experiences of the nursing team supporting frail older adults with high medical and care needs living in a LTCF. Using a descriptive qualitative design, data were gathered via one-to-one semi-structured interviews and thematically analyzed. Four themes emerged: Providing Care During COVID-19, Impact of COVID-19 on Staff, Organizational Management of COVID-19, and Training and Education. Visitation restrictions and staff shortages impacted all aspects of work life. Staff reported increased stress and exhaustion with COVID-19 infection resulting in long-term health issues. It is important to learn from these experiences to inform and empower staff to manage future outbreaks of infectious diseases. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(3), 40-46.].

Post-Acute Care Rehabilitation Services and Outcomes in Skilled Nursing Facilities Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This cohort study evaluates changes in rehabilitation services provided by skilled nursing facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Covid-19 Surveillance Testing and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of surveillance testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) among staff members in skilled nursing facilities, evidence is limited regarding its relationship with outcomes among facility residents. METHODS: Using data obtained from 2020 to 2022, we performed a retrospective cohort study of testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among staff members in 13,424 skilled nursing facilities during three pandemic periods: before vaccine approval, before the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant wave, and during the omicron wave. We assessed staff testing volumes during weeks without Covid-19 cases relative to other skilled nursing facilities in the same county, along with Covid-19 cases and deaths among residents during potential outbreaks (defined as the occurrence of a case after 2 weeks with no cases). We reported adjusted differences in outcomes between high-testing facilities (90th percentile of test volume) and low-testing facilities (10th percentile). The two primary outcomes were the weekly cumulative number of Covid-19 cases and related deaths among residents during potential outbreaks. RESULTS: During the overall study period, 519.7 cases of Covid-19 per 100 potential outbreaks were reported among residents of high-testing facilities as compared with 591.2 cases among residents of low-testing facilities (adjusted difference, -71.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -91.3 to -51.6). During the same period, 42.7 deaths per 100 potential outbreaks occurred in high-testing facilities as compared with 49.8 deaths in low-testing facilities (adjusted difference, -7.1; 95% CI, -11.0 to -3.2). Before vaccine availability, high- and low-testing facilities had 759.9 cases and 1060.2 cases, respectively, per 100 potential outbreaks (adjusted difference, -300.3; 95% CI, -377.1 to -223.5), along with 125.2 and 166.8 deaths (adjusted difference, -41.6; 95% CI, -57.8 to -25.5). Before the omicron wave, the numbers of cases and deaths were similar in high- and low-testing facilities; during the omicron wave, high-testing facilities had fewer cases among residents, but deaths were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Greater surveillance testing of staff members at skilled nursing facilities was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in Covid-19 cases and deaths among residents, particularly before vaccine availability.

The older adults' experiences of living in the nursing home during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Iran.

AIM: This study aimed to describe the experiences of older adults living in a nursing home during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study. METHODS: In present study, 20 older adults living in a nursing home in Rasht, northern Iran, participated. Purposeful sampling was applied until data saturation. The qualitative content analysis was done according to the steps proposed by Zhang and Wildemuth. RESULTS: The central theme was "Intensification of life problems in the nursing home", which emerged from the 115 primary codes, 4 main categories and 7 subcategories. The main categories included "feelings about COVID-19," "intensification of isolation and loneliness," "imprisonment and feeling forgotten" and "difficulty in adapting". CONCLUSION: Quarantine and special protocols have aggravated the hardships of life for older adults, and they experienced negative emotions in the nursing home. However, the older adults hoped that the situation would improve, and the pandemic would end.

Nursing Home to Nursing Home Transfers during the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the nursing home to nursing home transfer rates before and during the early COVID-19 pandemic and to identify risk factors associated with those transfers in a state with a policy to create COVID-19-care nursing homes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohorts of nursing home residents in prepandemic (2019) and COVID-19 (2020) periods. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Michigan long-term nursing home residents were identified from the Minimum Data Set. METHODS: Each year, we identified transfer events as a resident's first nursing home to nursing home transfer between March and December. We included residents' characteristics, health status, and nursing home characteristics to identify risk factors for transfer. Logistic regression models were conducted to determine risk factors for each period and changes in transfer rates between the 2 periods. RESULTS: Compared to the prepandemic period, the COVID-19 period had a higher transfer rate per 100 (7.7 vs 5.3, P < .05). Age ≥80 years, female sex, and Medicaid enrollment were associated with a lower likelihood of transfer for both periods. During the COVID-19 period, residents who were Black, with severe cognitive impairment, or had COVID-19 infection were associated with a higher risk of transfer [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) (95% CI): 1.46 (1.01-2.11), 1.88 (1.11-3.16), and 4.70 (3.30-6.68), respectively]. After adjusting for resident characteristics, health status, and nursing home characteristics, residents had 46% higher odds [AOR (95% CI): 1.46 (1.14-1.88)] of being transferred to another nursing home during the COVID-19 period compared to the prepandemic period. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In the early COVID-19 pandemic, Michigan designated 38 nursing homes to care for residents with COVID-19. We found a higher transfer rate during the pandemic than during the prepandemic period, especially among Black residents, residents with COVID-19 infection, or residents with severe cognitive impairment. Further investigation is warranted to understand the transfer practice better and if any policies would mitigate the transfer risk for these subgroups.

Learning from Nursing Home Infection Prevention and Control Citations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The devastating effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) highlight the critical need for effective infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in nursing homes. Nursing management and infection preventionists should be cognizant of the most common reasons underlying federal IPC citations during the pandemic. Analysis of IPC citation data from the first 7 months of the public health emergency identified that adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) and mask use, appropriate transmission-based precautions, and hand hygiene were the most common reasons for COVID-19-related F880 citations, including those that placed a person at immediate risk for serious injury or death. More specific staff practices and other factors leading to a citation are also highlighted. Although nursing homes may have limited control over factors such as PPE supply and staffing resources, nursing management and infection preventionists can use these results to help ensure that operational mechanisms, staff training, and adherence monitoring efforts effectively address the areas most associated with COVID-19 IPC noncompliance. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(2), 36-42.].

Crisis Management Tasks in Dutch Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Interview Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic hit long-term care, and particularly nursing homes hard. We aimed to explore how crisis management goals and tasks evolve during such a prolonged crisis, using the crisis management tasks as identified by Boin and 't Hart as a starting point. This longitudinal, qualitative study comprises 47 interviews with seven Dutch nursing home directors and a focus group. We identified two phases to the crisis response: an acute phase with a linear, rational perspective of saving lives and compliancy to centralized decision-making and an adaptive phase characterized by more decentralized decision-making, reflection, and competing values and perspectives. This study confirms the usability of Boin and 't Hart's typology of crisis management tasks and shows that these tasks "changed color" in the second phase. We also revealed three types of additional work in managing such a crisis: resilience work, emotion work, and normative work.